🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged lawmakers to approve a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Charities have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is largely happening at the local government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world bodies strike a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

Even as this international discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that governments globally are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.